Brand
Guidelines
The standards, systems, and principles that define how Assessed Intelligence appears, reads, and behaves in the world.
This book is a working reference for everyone who creates, reviews, or approves work in the Assessed Intelligence name. It covers identity — what we stand for and how we introduce ourselves — the visual system (logo, color, typography, layout), and the document formats that carry our governance work into the world.
If you're building anything customer-facing or partner-visible, this is your starting point. For anything that isn't covered here, reach out before you ship.
This is Brand Guidelines v2.0, released 2026. All prior versions are superseded. Any working files using pre-v2.0 tokens, type families, or lockups should be brought into alignment before next use.
Positioning
Governance that holds up when it matters most.
that holds up
when it
matters most.
This is the single sentence that captures what we do and why we're different. It goes where we have one shot to introduce the firm — a website hero, a first-slide deck cover, a door-opener line in a new conversation. It doesn't need a qualifier and it shouldn't be softened.
Build Bold. Govern Smarter.
The two-beat campaign phrase that carries the firm's posture into decks, ad units, event banners, and recruiting surfaces. Build Bold speaks to the ambition of clients who are shipping real technology; Govern Smarter names what we do about it. Always together, always in that order, always with the period after each phrase. Acceptable on covers, hero surfaces, and campaign collateral; never used in body copy or substituted for the primary positioning line above.
The longer-form positioning line used on assessedintelligence.com and other web hero surfaces where the audience needs a sentence rather than a slogan. It does the same work as the primary line ("Governance that holds up when it matters most.") but for a reader who has just landed and needs the value proposition in plain language. Use only on web hero / above-the-fold surfaces. Do not pair it with the primary positioning line in the same composition — pick one. Set in Lato Regular, sentence case, em-dash separator (not a hyphen), terminal period.
How to use it
Hero surfaces only. The positioning line earns its weight by scarcity. Don't scatter it across body copy. One placement per page, per deck, per document.
No modifications. Don't shorten it to "Governance that holds up." Don't add "for AI" or "for infrastructure." The strength of the line is in the full cadence.
Companion voice. When the positioning needs a second beat, the character line follows: Forged by Experience · Driven by Purpose · Built to Endure.
Picking the right line
| Surface | Use this line |
|---|---|
| Deck cover · pitch · leave-behind | Governance that holds up when it matters most. |
| Campaign · ad · banner · recruiting | Build Bold. Govern Smarter. |
| Web hero · marketing site | High-risk technology creates complex risks — we make governance real, operational, and auditable. |
| ARISE Framework surface | Evolve and Endure. |
Why these lines all end with a period
Look at the four lines — every single one terminates with a period. That's not accidental. Positioning is the firm's first promise; ending each line with a period is the typographic equivalent of this is a statement of fact, no ambiguity.
A period closes the sentence and refuses to leave room for hedging. Compliance brands habitually end with a question mark ("Ready for what's next?") or a colon ("Built for:"). Both invite continuation, both signal openness to interpretation. The brand explicitly rejects that posture. Findings are stated. Controls are named. Consequences are quantified. The period at the end of every positioning line is the same moral commitment, scaled down to a single character.
This connects directly to the red dot in the typographic lockup of the wordmark (slide 04). The dot is the same period, made larger and colored, doing the same work: marking the brand's refusal to deal in approximations.
Who We Are
Assessed Intelligence is a Disabled Veteran-owned consultancy — forged in real-world operations, hardened by missions, and built to help organizations navigate the intersection of cybersecurity, AI governance, and regulatory compliance.
Our mission is to ensure Secure & Responsible Technology. Like the OSS — the U.S. intelligence agency founded during World War II — we were founded on a simple, relentless idea: the challenges of tomorrow will not be overcome by conventional means. Where others see chaos, we see an opportunity to rethink security and ethics from the ground up.
The team
A band of misfits, bold thinkers, technologists, and strategists brought together by a shared commitment to make technology secure, ethical, and equitable from the start.
The firm is staffed by people who have done the work in places where it had to hold up — battlefield operations, deployed missions, critical-industry incident response, regulated AI rollouts. We're not credential-collectors. We're practitioners with scars. That's what lets us tell a client whether a control will survive the next audit, and whether a governance program will survive the next executive turnover.
What we do
We unify cybersecurity, AI governance, and compliance into one operational program. Four core capabilities anchor the practice — each delivered through our four services on the next slide.
| — | Capability | What it means in practice |
|---|---|---|
01 |
Integrated Risk Management | We unify AI, cybersecurity, and regulatory risk into a single operational framework. Identify exposure early, manage it consistently, and support responsible innovation across complex digital environments. |
02 |
Operational Governance | We translate policy into action. Practical governance frameworks, advisory support, and the kind of day-to-day oversight that ensures responsible AI deployment doesn't drift between board approval and production. |
03 |
Independent Validation | Audits, assessments, and attestation services that confirm compliance, strengthen resilience, and build trust with regulators, partners, and stakeholders. The work that produces documents other parties can rely on. |
04 |
Technical Innovation & Engineering | Proprietary tools, AI technology analysis, and engineer-focused technical reviews. We build the assessment platforms that operationalize the ARISE Framework, analyze emerging AI capabilities and regulatory trajectories, and deliver the engineering-depth review that makes governance programs verifiable end-to-end. |
How those capabilities show up in the services
Each capability runs primarily through one of the four services and crosses into others as a supporting discipline:
| Capability | Primary service home | Also touches |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Risk Management | Implement — Advisory | Operate, Validate |
| Operational Governance | Operate — vCISO & vCRAIO | Implement |
| Independent Validation | Validate — Audit & Attestation | Implement |
| Technical Innovation & Engineering | Innovate — Solutions & Engineering | Implement, Operate, Validate |
What we stand for
Our values are not statements on a wall. They are operating principles — forged through real-world engagements, high-stakes environments, and a relentless commitment to doing the right thing.
Dedication
Three values, one posture: do the work, hold the line, deliver outcomes that survive scrutiny. Every engagement, every report, every client conversation is measured against them.
The Mark
A plain-spoken wordmark. No abstract symbol, no monogram, no brand-name stunt. Just the firm's name, set clearly, with a horizontal rule dividing the two halves.
The mark is a statement of posture. Governance work doesn't benefit from visual flourish. The wordmark signals steadiness and literal meaning — "Assessed Intelligence" printed with discipline — which is the experience we want clients to have with the work itself.
Why this name
The name does two jobs — each word carries its own weight, and the order matters.
Assessed — the firm's verb. Most consultancies pick a noun for their identity (Strategy. Trust. Insight. Systems.). The verb form is the differentiator. Assessment is a discipline, not a commodity — it's the act of looking at evidence, weighing it against a standard, and rendering a defensible judgment. That's exactly what the firm does: audits, posture reviews, control evaluations, ARISE assessments. The work product is always a judgment based on observable evidence, never an opinion based on vibes.
"Assessed" is also past tense. The work has been done. Not assessing (still in progress) or assess (imperative). The firm doesn't sell the promise of evaluation; it sells the result of it.
Intelligence — the firm's noun. Three meanings stack here, all intentional:
- Intelligence as evidence-grounded knowledge — the OSS / national-security tradition the firm explicitly invokes. Information that has been collected, corroborated, and assessed before it's acted on. Not raw data, not opinion, not speculation.
- Intelligence as in AI — the artificial intelligence at the heart of "AI governance." Putting Intelligence in the name names the firm's primary subject matter without dating the brand the way "AI Co." would.
- Intelligence as cognitive capacity — the firm's product is judgment. Advisors don't just produce documents; they produce thinking that organizations can rely on. Intelligence claims that ground.
Why the order matters. Assessed Intelligence, not Intelligent Assessment. Reverse the order and the meaning flips. Intelligent Assessment would mean "smart evaluations" — adjective modifying noun. The brand becomes about how clever the assessments are.
Assessed Intelligence means "intelligence that has been assessed" — verb modifying noun. The brand is about what survives examination. The information you can act on. The findings that hold up. That's the entire posture of the firm in two words: we don't sell intelligence; we sell intelligence that has been verified.
The horizontal rule between "Assessed" and "Intelligence" is the visual encoding of this same logic. Above the line: the act of assessment (what we do). Below the line: the result, intelligence (what you receive). The line is the work itself — the boundary that separates raw input from defensible output. In the typographic fallback where the rule can't be drawn, the Radical Red dot does the same job: a period between the verb that's been completed and the noun that resulted. This has been assessed, no ambiguity.
Variations
The same wordmark on darker grounds. Use these where the surface or composition calls for the brand to anchor a dark field.
Typographic fallback
For environments where the wordmark image cannot be used — system emails, plain-text signatures, third-party platforms that strip imagery, terminal output, watermarks rendered in a single font — use the typographic fallback. The two words are separated by a Radical Red dot, set inline.
When to use. Only when the image-based wordmark is impossible. The fallback is functional, not promotional — never use it on covers, hero surfaces, or any composition where the proper wordmark could be embedded instead.
Construction. Both words set in Rift Regular (Oswald 500 fallback), uppercase, letter-spacing +0.18em on each word independently. The dot is Radical Red #FF4B6F, sized to roughly 0.25× the cap height. The dot's margins are asymmetric on purpose — 8px on the left (compensating for the trailing letter-spacing after "Assessed") and 18px on the right. This produces equal optical gutters on both sides. Don't apply letter-spacing to the parent flex container, only to the word spans — otherwise the trailing letter-spacing creates uneven gaps around the dot.
Why the dot
The red dot is a period, not a separator. A comma invites continuation — "and here's the nuance, and here's the qualifier." A period closes the sentence. The dot in the lockup carries the brand's posture in its smallest possible form: this is a statement of fact, no ambiguity.
The firm doesn't deal in approximations or qualified opinions. When Assessed Intelligence renders a finding, it's evidence-grounded and defensible. The dot is the typographic embodiment of that discipline — it says what it says. It also marks the relationship between the two words: Assessed and Intelligence are sequential, not synonymous; intelligence follows assessment. Where the wordmark uses a horizontal rule to express that, the typographic fallback uses the dot.
A circle was the only viable separator. A dash would read as hyphenation; a slash would imply alternation; a bullet would feel listy; a vertical bar would feel like UI chrome. A solid red dot reads as emphasis — the brand's way of saying this matters — without grammatical baggage. It scales from 14px in the typographic lockup to 12px in the compact monogram to 5px in document footers, doing the same work at every size.
Compact monogram
The compact monogram distills the full identity into two letters and a dot — the smallest unit that still carries the brand's meaning. A stands for Assessed: the rigorous, evidence-driven process the firm applies to every engagement. I stands for Intelligence: the insight that emerges only after that process is complete. The Radical Red dot between them is the same period that appears in the wordmark — a declarative full stop that says this is a finding, not an opinion. Together, A·I reads as a single statement of fact: assessment produces intelligence, and the dot closes the case.
Use the compact monogram for favicons, social avatars, app icons, terminal banners, and any 32–128px square where the full wordmark won't read. It carries the same intentional sequence — assessment first, intelligence second, certainty always — at every size the brand appears.
Construction. Letters A and I set in Rift Regular (Oswald 500 fallback), uppercase, no letter-spacing. The dot is Radical Red, sized to roughly 0.08× the cap height. Layout uses a flex row with an 8px gap and the dot's natural margins do the rest — no equal-column grid, since A and I have very different optical widths and forcing them into matched columns pushes them too far apart.
When to use. Use the compact monogram only at sizes 128px square or smaller. Above that, the full typographic fallback or the proper wordmark applies.
Anatomy
Word 1 — Assessed. Set in the brand display face, uppercase, letter-spaced to the open specimen.
Rule. A 1pt horizontal line spanning the full width of the word above. Never thicker, never a double rule, never dashed.
Word 2 — Intelligence. Same face, lighter weight, tighter spacing, smaller body. The subordinate position is intentional — intelligence follows assessment.
Taglines
Hero — display treatment
&
Responsible
Technology.
Stacked, Title Case, set in Lato on dark ground with a coral terminal period. Used on web hero, campaign openers, and cover surfaces where the tagline carries the composition on its own.
Lockup — formal
The horizontal lockup. Sits beneath the wordmark in footers, sign-offs, and formal collateral. Always Rift Bold uppercase with a turquoise ampersand (Oswald 700 if Rift unavailable).
Character line — editorial
The firm's character line. Used on editorial surfaces — report sign-offs, document colophons, recruiting materials — where the tone is earned rather than asserted. Never substitutes for the primary.
Rules
Hierarchy. Never stack both primary taglines on the same surface. One per composition; the hero leads on first introduction.
Translation. Taglines are not translated. Both lines remain in English regardless of market or document language.
Punctuation. Primary: ampersand (&). Character line: pipe (|) with hair-space padding. Do not substitute dashes or bullets.
The terminal red period
The hero treatment ends with a single Radical Red period after "Technology." That period is the brand's signature. It is the only color note in an otherwise restrained composition — a Mirage field, Lato Light, no ornament — and it does deliberate work: it tells the reader this is a statement of fact, no ambiguity.
Secure & Responsible Technology. with a period is a declaration. Without it, the line drifts toward marketing aspiration. The firm doesn't aspire to secure and responsible technology — it delivers it. The period closes that distinction.
The same red period appears on the LinkedIn cover banner, on the dot between "Assessed" and "Intelligence" in the typographic lockup (slide 04), and as the terminal punctuation on the campaign tagline ("Build Bold. Govern Smarter."). It's a recurring system element, not a styling choice. Wherever the firm makes a claim it intends to stand behind, the red period appears.
Don't omit it. A tagline without its terminal period reads as a sentence fragment — the brand explicitly rejects that posture. The character line ("Forged by Experience | Driven by Purpose | Built to Endure") is the one exception, since pipe separators do their own punctuation work.
ARISE Framework™
The ARISE Framework — Assurance of Responsible, Innovative, and Secure Environments — is a proprietary seven-pillar governance model and the methodological backbone of our audit and advisory work. It is a distinct sub-brand with its own identity, always presented with attribution.
The wordmark
Evolve and Endure.
The one-line promise of ARISE. Where the firm's positioning speaks to governance that holds up, the framework's own tagline speaks to what makes that possible — a living control set that adapts as AI, regulation, and risk evolve. Used on the framework cover, ARISE Explorer surfaces, pillar-introduction decks, and certification collateral. Always terminal with a period, always presented in Rift (or Oswald fallback), never substituted for the primary Assessed Intelligence positioning.
The seven pillars
Govern · Manage · Identify · Protect · Detect · Respond · Validate. A continuous, interdependent assurance cycle. 128 controls and 889 control requirements distributed across the seven pillars. Each pillar carries its own color in the ARISE Pillar Palette (slide 17).
Sub-brand rules
Always attributed. First mention on any surface includes the ™ mark and, when space allows, "by Assessed Intelligence." Subsequent mentions can drop the attribution.
6° skew. The ARISE wordmark is set at a 6° forward skew — the sub-brand's single geometric signature. Never apply the skew to the Assessed Intelligence wordmark or to any other element.
Own the domain. Framework documentation lives at ariseframework.com. Deep links from Assessed Intelligence surfaces are fine; embedding framework content under our domain is not.
Service Architecture
Four named disciplines. Every engagement maps to one or more — and every page on assessedintelligence.com organizes around this structure.
FIXED ORDER · THIRD TILE ACCENTED IN RHINO
| Discipline | Sub-label | What it covers |
|---|---|---|
| Implement | ADVISORY | Scoped advisory service to deploy programs, capabilities, or implement governance frameworks. Project-based engagements with clear deliverables — targeted regulatory alignment, control build-out, and audit preparation for AI and cybersecurity programs that must be defensible when it counts. |
| Operate | RETAINER SERVICES | Strategic leadership and expertise embedded with client teams to operationalize their programs and scale their abilities. Senior cybersecurity, AI governance, legal, and ethical specialists integrated into the client organization without the cost or commitment of full-time hires. Anchored by vCISO and vCRAIO roles. |
| Validate | AUDIT & ATTESTATION | Audit and attestation services that provide independent validation of an organization's controls — building stakeholder trust. Third-party assessment for AI governance, cybersecurity, and regulatory compliance, producing the verified evidence that regulators, auditors, and investors require. |
| Innovate | SOLUTIONS | Proprietary tools, AI technology analysis, and engineer-focused technical reviews — producing technology solutions that organizations can deploy with confidence and defend under scrutiny. ARISE is the anchor product of this track. |
Capabilities under each service
Every capability on the site maps to one of these four services. Partners referencing a specific service should use the canonical sub-label ("Implement · Advisory", "Operate · Retainer Services") rather than the discipline name alone, to avoid confusion with the capability name.
| Service | Capabilities |
|---|---|
| Implement | ARISE Framework Implementation · Responsible AI Governance · Regulatory & Legal Readiness · Integrated Risk Intelligence · Startup & VC Diligence |
| Operate | Executive Leadership (vCISO, vCRAIO) · On-Demand Advisory · Operational Resilience · Workforce Enablement |
| Validate | Internal & Gap Audits · AI & Security Education (assessments) |
| Innovate | ARISE Framework (IP) · Assessed Regulation Intelligence · proprietary tools |
Use the exact service names as shown, in the exact order: Implement · Operate · Validate · Innovate. Don't reorder for narrative convenience (e.g. leading with Validate because an engagement is audit-heavy). Don't substitute synonyms — "Assurance" is not a synonym for Validate; "Advisory" is the sub-label for Implement, not its replacement. When referencing the whole model in body copy, call it the Service Architecture — never "our four services" or "the four pillars" (pillars belong to ARISE).
Voice & Tone
Four pillars that together describe how the firm talks on the page.
Authoritative
We assess, recommend, and stand behind it. Hedging language (might, could, in some cases) is used only where it's technically warranted, never as a defense mechanism.
Disciplined
We write with structure. Claims are separated from caveats; evidence is cited; conclusions are numbered. The shape of the document reflects the shape of the thinking.
Measured
We don't alarm, oversell, or perform. Governance work loses trust the moment it sounds like marketing. Calm over dramatic.
Humane
We write for the reader across the table. Jargon is used when it's accurate, unwound when it's not. The goal is clarity, not credentialing.
Before shipping any external writing, read it aloud. If a sentence wouldn't survive being read to a client's CEO in a room, rewrite it.
Writing Principles
Six principles that govern how Assessed Intelligence writes. Each one is paired with a "weak" example you'll see in the wild and a "strong" rewrite that matches the firm's voice.
1. Lead with the finding
Every report, memo, and section opens with the conclusion. Readers should be able to stop after the first paragraph and know our position.
2. Cite or don't claim
If a statement could be challenged, it needs a citation — to a control, a document, a log, or a named source. Unsupported assertions are noise.
3. Numbers over adjectives
"76% of controls implemented" beats "most controls implemented." When we can't quantify, we say so plainly rather than reaching for superlatives.
4. Name the reader
Every document has one audience. Write to them — CISO, auditor, board, engineer — and don't split the difference.
5. No passive escape hatches
Avoid "it is recommended that" and "concerns have been raised." Name who is recommending and who is concerned.
6. Short paragraphs
Dense prose hides weak thinking. Each paragraph carries one claim and its support.
Three areas remain open: model monitoring, supplier risk, and AI-to-enterprise risk integration. Each is detailed in §3."
Before sending any document, ask: could a senior partner read just the first paragraph and know what we found, what we recommend, and who needs to act? If not, the lead is buried — rewrite.
The Logo
A two-word wordmark split by a horizontal rule. Set in the brand display face.
The logo is the most frequently reproduced artifact in the system. Its authority comes from repetition, not from elaboration — which is why there is no graphical mark, no monogram, no shield, no lockup-with-tagline primary. Just the wordmark.
Construction
| Top word | ASSESSED — uppercase, display face, letter-spacing 0.02em, cap height = X |
| Rule | 1pt horizontal line, width = top word width, color inherits from context |
| Bottom word | INTELLIGENCE — uppercase, display face, letter-spacing 0.22em, cap height ≈ 0.48 × X |
Always reach for the vector master (.svg or .ai). Raster exports (.png) are for specific placements and are not acceptable in print above small logo sizes.
Variations
| Variant | Ink | Use |
|---|---|---|
| Primary — Mirage | Ink on light | Default. Use anywhere the surface is white or Desert Storm. |
| Reverse — White | White on dark | Dark surfaces, photo overlays, Mirage backgrounds. |
| Rhino | Navy on light | When the primary feels too heavy and the surface is a pale neutral. |
| Mono — Black | Black on any | Newspaper, single-ink print, fax-era fallback. |
What's not a variant
Color variants (turquoise wordmark, red wordmark) do not exist. Gradient versions do not exist. Drop-shadow versions do not exist. If a variant isn't in the asset library, it's not approved.
Clear Space & Minimum Size
Clear space
The exclusion zone around the logo equals the cap height of the word ASSESSED (X). No competing type, imagery, or rule may enter this zone — including other logos, partner marks, page edges, and UI chrome.
Minimum size
| Medium | Minimum width |
|---|---|
| Digital | 160 px wide |
| 1.25 in wide |
Below these thresholds, the horizontal rule in the wordmark collapses visually. Use a full-size lockup in supporting collateral, favicons, or reduce the mark only where required by the medium.
Misuse
Visual examples of what not to do. The wordmark only ever appears in the four approved variants on the previous slide.
Other prohibited modifications
- Don't substitute the typeface. The wordmark is a drawn glyph set — retyping in Rift or Oswald is not equivalent.
- Don't pair the logo with emoji, icons, or decorative flourishes.
- Don't rebuild the lockup with the two words on a single line — the rule separator is structural.
- Don't resize the words independently of each other.
- Don't recolor the wordmark beyond the four approved variants.
Primary Palette
Four colors carry the majority of every composition. These are the surfaces, the ink, and the rules.
The palette in use
The same content rendered three ways — Desert Storm paper, Mirage dark, and Rhino navy. The hierarchy holds across all three because the primary palette is engineered to do exactly this work.
by Design
by Design
by Design
What the primary palette doesn't carry
Look at the four primary colors and what's missing — emotion. Mirage, Rhino, Desert Storm, and Ash Grey are the firm's architecture: they hold the type, the surfaces, and the rules. None of them speak. None of them assert.
That's deliberate. The primary palette is meant to be steady and quiet so the rare moments of red — the terminal period on the tagline, the dot between "Assessed" and "Intelligence," the status indicators on document covers — can do their work without competing for attention. Red carries the brand's signature posture: this is a statement of fact, no ambiguity. The full rationale is on the Accents slide. Here, the takeaway is that the primary palette earns its weight by saying nothing emotional, so the accent palette can.
Secondary Palette
Two deep-tone neutrals that expand the ink range without introducing color temperature shifts.
Side-by-side
Iridium is cool; Thunder is warm. The same composition rendered on each shows the difference plainly — both work as dark surfaces, but they don't read interchangeably.
Position
Position
When to use which
| Use case | Iridium | Thunder |
|---|---|---|
| Body type on light | Default for technical and audit content | Avoid — warm undertone reads off-brand at body scale |
| Dark surface for body copy | Long-form technical reading | Editorial covers, recruiting |
| Headline color | When pairing with neutrals only | When the document mood is editorial, not technical |
| Photo overlay tint | Cool photography (architecture, screens, diagrams) | Warm photography (people, environments) |
When in doubt, use Iridium. It's the safer pick for the firm's default voice — analytical, technical, evidence-grounded. Thunder is the deliberate exception, not the equal alternative.
Accent Colors
Two accents. Used sparingly, with precise jobs.
Radical Red is always intentional. A stray accent-color border or button on an otherwise neutral surface is a style drift, not brand. When in doubt, leave it out.
Accents in use
Three small specimens showing the accents doing exactly the work they're allocated. Each occupies a fraction of the surface; remove the accent and the composition still reads.
Evidence
& Control Review
&
Responsible
Technology.
Style drift vs. correct use
The same composition on the left has the accent doing too much; on the right, the accent does its single job. Both surfaces use Radical Red — one earns the color, the other doesn't.
Exceeds Tolerance
Exceeds Tolerance
Why Radical Red carries the brand's signature
Of all the colors in the system, Radical Red is the only one tied to consequence. Mirage and Rhino carry architecture; Desert Storm is paper; Iridium and the secondary neutrals quietly structure information; Turquoise is technical — the "this is alive" indicator on dark surfaces. Red is human. It's the color the brand uses when something matters.
That's why a single red dot, used sparingly, becomes the brand's most recognizable signature. The terminal period on Secure & Responsible Technology. The dot between "Assessed" and "Intelligence" in the typographic lockup. The status marker on document confidentiality lines. In each case the red is doing the same job: this is a statement of fact, no ambiguity.
Because the firm refuses to deal in approximations or qualified opinions, the brand needs one color that says so visually. Capping Radical Red at ≤2% of any composition isn't restraint for restraint's sake — it's what makes the dot read as a declaration rather than as decoration. If red shows up everywhere, it stops meaning anything. That's why the discipline matters.
ARISE Pillar Palette
Seven colors — one per ARISE pillar. Used exclusively when labeling, categorizing, or visualizing the framework itself.
ARISE pillar colors are framework-specific. They appear on ARISE Explorer (ariseframework.com), pillar tokens, domain diagrams, audit reports that map findings to pillars, and ARISE-branded marketing surfaces. Do not mix with the Primary or Secondary palettes as decorative fills — a coral tile next to a Desert Storm card reads as off-brand. If you're not labeling a pillar, use Mirage / Rhino / Desert Storm instead.
Pillar badges: small rounded pills with the pillar name in white, background = pillar color. Accent underlines: 4px colored bar along the bottom of domain tiles (see Partner Hub). Diagram fills: use at full saturation for categorical nodes; lighten to 15% alpha for background zones. Never on body text, never in the logo, never in the Certification Mark.
60 / 30 / 8 / 2
The proportion rule that keeps work on-brand even when an individual token is swapped.
60% primary neutral — the paper-and-ink majority. Desert Storm, Mirage, or white depending on surface.
30% secondary — Rhino, Iridium, or Ash Grey providing structure and hierarchy.
8% turquoise — eyebrows, active states, punctuation. Present but never dominant.
2% radical red — the hardest constraint. Used as a signal, not a style. One red element per surface is usually enough; two is often too many.
Rift
The condensed, industrial display family that carries the Assessed Intelligence wordmark, slide titles, section labels, and metric callouts. Uppercase only, with a disciplined letter-spacing.
Character set
Headline specimens
Decisions
Weight comparison
Use
The wordmark. "Assessed / Intelligence" is set in Rift — hairline weight over regular, divided by a single horizontal rule. This is the primary expression of the brand and appears on every cover, letterhead, and formal surface.
Decks and documents. Section titles, slide titles, page numbers, cover display, metric big-numbers.
Web. Hero heads, slide titles, positioning statements. Body headers on web stay in Lato display weights — Rift is reserved for hero-level and wordmark emphasis.
Weights
Rift Regular (400) is the default display weight. Rift Bold (700) for metric big-numbers and high-emphasis headlines. Rift Light (300) only appears in the wordmark itself, where "ASSESSED" is set in Light over "INTELLIGENCE" in Bold.
When Rift is not available — licensed seat not installed, third-party collaborator, urgent turnaround without access — Oswald (Google Fonts) is the only acceptable substitute. Oswald and Rift share the same condensed industrial posture, letterforms, and uppercase discipline. No other display substitute is permitted. Do not use Oswald when Rift is available. Do not mix Rift and Oswald in the same document.
Rift is licensed from TypeTogether. Partners requiring production-quality materials featuring the Assessed Intelligence wordmark must either purchase a Rift seat or request a rendered master from marketing@assessedintelligence.com. Partners producing collateral at speed without Rift must use Oswald — never Arial Narrow, Impact, Bebas, or other condensed substitutes.
Lato
The humanist sans-serif that carries body copy, long-form reading, and most of the web interface.
Pull-quote scale
Weight specimens
Weights
| Weight | Use |
|---|---|
| Lato 300 (Light) | Lead paragraphs, hero subheads, oversized display body. |
| Lato 400 (Regular) | Default body text. |
| Lato 700 (Bold) | Strong emphasis, button labels, section-intro emphasis. |
| Lato 900 (Black) | Rare. Reserved for editorial moments that need extra weight. |
Type System in Use
| Role | Face / weight | Case & spacing |
|---|---|---|
| Display / Hero | Rift Regular (Oswald 500 fallback) | Uppercase · 0.02em |
| Slide title | Rift Regular (Oswald 500 fallback) | Uppercase · 0.03em |
| Eyebrow | Lato 700 | Uppercase · 0.22em, 11px |
| Body | Lato 400 | Sentence case, 16px, 1.55 line-height |
| Body — lead | Lato 300 | Sentence case, 22px, 1.5 line-height |
| Metric big-number | Rift Bold (Oswald 600 fallback) | Uppercase · tight — 76%, 128, etc. |
| Mono / metadata | JetBrains Mono 500 | Uppercase · 0.22em, 11px — page labels, version tags |
The system in one composition
The full hierarchy applied to a single editorial moment. Every level above appears once, in its correct face and weight.
Decision-Making
Graphic Elements
Non-type elements that repeat across the system and carry brand recognition on their own.
Frame with corner ticks
A 1pt Rhino rectangle with small tick marks at each corner. Can be used on document pages, deck slides, and feature cards — an optional structural treatment, not a required one. When applied, the ticks are structural punctuation, not decoration: always the same size, always aligned to the rule.
or deck slide content
Rules & dividers
1pt Rhino or Ash Grey, depending on contrast. Never 2pt+, never dashed, never gradient. Section breaks use a short 80px Rhino bar.
Red dot bullets
Small 6×6px Radical Red squares for list items. A list with more than one red-dot item is rare — use sparingly; for longer lists use default bullets.
- The single most important finding in an audit report.
- Any second item that's nearly equal weight.
Metric cards
White card with a 4px Radical Red top border and a large Rift Bold (or Oswald 600 fallback) number. Reserved for signature statistics (e.g., the 128 controls metric). Don't populate with minor figures.
Applications
A short tour of the surfaces where the brand appears — web pages, decks, documents, digital, and environmental.
The brand in three primary surfaces
SERVICES · ABOUT · CONTACT
That Holds Up.
& Control
Review
Website. Capability pages (ARISE Framework, Audits, vCISO, vCRAIO, Implement, Operate, Validate, Innovate) follow a common skeleton: dark hero, supporting frame sections, signature metric card, and the ARISE references rail.
Decks. 1920×1080, dark-and-light alternation, one idea per slide. Master templates live in the Brand Kit.
Documents. Audit reports, external memos, statements of work, and pitch decks each have their own template — covered in the next section.
Digital. LinkedIn banner, email signature, Google Workspace mark. The brand reads the same in the inbox as it does on the report cover.
Business Card
The standard-issue card for every Assessed Intelligence representative. Fill in your details below to preview your card; download a PNG of the front for print vendor requests or digital sharing.
Downloads a 300 DPI PNG with both sides, 0.125″ bleed, and crop marks — print-vendor ready.
The downloaded PNG is print-vendor ready — 300 DPI, both sides, 0.125″ bleed, crop marks. Send it directly to your preferred print vendor, or email to marketing@assessedintelligence.com for central ordering on brand-approved stock. Vendor note: file is RGB (sRGB); most vendors handle RGB-to-CMYK conversion automatically, or request a CMYK proof before press.
Card back
The reverse of every card. Centered wordmark on Mirage-to-Rhino gradient. Not customized per person.
Front specifications
| Element | Spec |
|---|---|
| Name | Lato 900 (Black) · Mirage · sentence case, not caps |
| Title | Lato 900 (Black) · Radical Red · sentence case |
| Rule | 1pt Mirage horizontal line, spanning the full card width |
| Contact icons | Filled Mirage circles, white glyph (phone, envelope) — 28×28pt |
| Contact text | Lato 400 · Mirage · phone as written, email as written |
| Bottom band | Mirage fill, full-bleed; "Secure & Responsible Technology." in Lato 700 white centered; URL below in Lato 400 white |
Print specs
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Trim size | 3.5" × 2" (US standard) · 85mm × 55mm (EU) |
| Bleed | 0.125" (3mm) on all sides |
| Safe area | 0.125" (3mm) inside trim — keep all text inside |
| Stock | 32pt uncoated matte, natural white · preferred · or 16pt silk lamination |
| Ink | Full-color CMYK both sides · no spot colors · no foil |
| File format | Print-ready PDF/X-4, fonts embedded, 300dpi, CMYK profile |
Partner organizations producing co-branded collateral do not receive Assessed Intelligence business cards. Partners use their own card design with their own name and title, and may reference the Assessed Intelligence partnership in their own company materials per the co-branding rules on slide 06. The Certification Mark (slide 25) may appear on a partner's card only if the partner has completed the ARISE certification process.
Certification Mark
The graphical seal we grant to audited-and-validated partners. A distinct artifact from the primary wordmark, used only by authorized third parties.
Who may use it
ARISE Control Partners at the Preferred (Vetted) tier and any audited client whose engagement has concluded with a passing attestation. Authorization is time-bounded — the mark carries a vintage year.
How it's used
On the partner's own surfaces: website trust bar, product page, sales one-pager, investor deck. Always with "Assessed by Assessed Intelligence" wordmark beneath, and always at or above the minimum size in the certified-mark spec.
What's not permitted
No recoloring, no resizing of elements within the mark, no placement that implies a broader relationship than the audit scope.
All uses of the certification mark require written confirmation from marketing@assessedintelligence.com. The mark is controlled artwork — partners receive an approved master file when authorized; no other version may be reproduced.
Document Templates
Three document formats carry the majority of what leaves the firm. Each has its own master, its own cadence, and its own identifier scheme.
| Document | ID format | Use |
|---|---|---|
| Audit Report | AI-AUD-YYYY-NNNN |
Formal attestation output. Carries ARISE domain mapping, evidence index, and numbered findings. |
| External Memo | AI-MEMO-YYYY-NNNN |
Client-facing position document. Shorter than a report, longer than an email. Used for recommendations, posture updates, and decision briefings. |
| Statement of Work | AI-SOW-YYYY-NNNN |
Engagement contract. Scope, deliverables, timeline, commercial terms. |
Common structure
All three share the same cover (Mirage background, wordmark top-left, title in Rift, ID in Mono, vintage year), the same frame-with-ticks page system, and the same three-line centered footer.
Footer
Assessed Intelligence · AI-AUD-2026-0001
Secure & Responsible Technology.
Forged by Experience · Driven by Purpose · Built to Endure
Templates and working files live in the Brand Kit's Resources section. Don't start a document from a blank — always fork the master.
Digital & Social
The brand reduced to pixels: LinkedIn, email, Google Workspace, and the handful of places where we're measured in 40×40px icons.
LinkedIn cover
Mirage field with the brand promise — Secure & Responsible Technology. — right-aligned in Lato Light, separated by a thin vertical rule. The trailing red dot is the only color note. The left two-thirds stays clear so the profile avatar overlap doesn't collide with content.
Profile avatar & small-format marks
Email signature
Name, title, Assessed Intelligence, then phone if relevant, then one link (assessedintelligence.com). No quote, no tagline, no banner image.
Favicon and small-format
Where a square format is forced (favicon, Slack logo, app icon), use the compact monogram — A · Radical Red dot · I — on Mirage. Full construction is documented on slide 04 (The Mark). The full two-word wordmark does not scale below the minimum size in these places, but the monogram does — cleanly down to 32×32.
Governance
A brand doesn't stay disciplined by accident. Somebody owns it, somebody approves new uses, and there's a clear path for proposing changes.
Brand custody
The Marketing & Leadership team owns the system and the asset library. New assets, new lockups, new applications go through them before deployment.
Version control
Guidelines are versioned on a calendar cadence (currently v2.0, 2026). Between versions, additions are published as appendices in the Brand Kit. Contradictions are resolved by the most recent artifact — the Brand Kit app is the source of truth.
Asking questions
For anything that isn't covered in this document, reach out before you ship. A 2-minute conversation beats a week of rework.
Brand & design questions: marketing@assessedintelligence.com
Partner program: partners@assessedintelligence.com
Press & speaking: marketing@assessedintelligence.com